- collateral estoppel doctrine
- Prior judgment between same parties on different cause of action is an estoppel as to those matters in issue or points controverted, on determination of which finding or verdict was rendered. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Union Carbide Corp., D.C.I11., 250 F.Supp. 816, 819.When an issue of ultimate fact has been determined by a valid judgment, that issue cannot be again litigated between the same parties in future litigation. City of St. Joseph v. Johnson, Mo.App., 539 S.W.2d 784, 785.As a bar to relitigating an issue which has already been tried between the same parties or their privies, it must be pleaded affirmatively. Fed.R. Civil P. 8(c). It is applicable to criminal cases. Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443-444, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 1194, 25 L.Ed.2d 469.@ offensive and defensive collateral estoppel@ offensive collateral estoppel@ defensive collateral estoppelOffensive and defensive collateral estoppel. "Offensive collateral estoppel" is used by plaintiff to prevent relitigation of issues previously lost against another plaintiff by a defendant, in contrast to "defensive collateral estoppel" which prevents relitigation by plaintiff of issues previously lost against another defendant. Collins v. Seaboard Coastline R. Co., C.A.Ga., 681 F.2d 1333, 1334.+ defensive collateral estoppelDoctrine precluding plaintiff from relitigating identical issues by merely switching adversary; thus, defensive collateral estoppel gives plaintiff strong incentive to join all possible defendants in first action if possible. Baron v. Bryant, D.C. Hawaii, 556 F.Supp. 531, 536.See also collateral estoppel- administrative estoppel- issue preclusion- res (res judicata)- verdict, estoppel by@
Black's law dictionary. HENRY CAMPBELL BLACK, M. A.. 1990.